VIC·TORI
PROJECTS
← SELECTED WORK
COMMIX · CONTEXTUAL COMMENTS · REVIEW GRAPH

Make the relationship between content and response explicit.

A contextual interaction system in which a comment is attached to the exact object or fragment it refers to — and every comment can itself become the object of another comment.

The project started from a simple limitation of ordinary discussion systems: messages are usually stored as a chronological stream, while the meaning of a response depends on what exactly it refers to. COMmix makes that relation visible and persistent.

COMmix interface with a source document and a visible graph of contextual reviews
Source document and contextual review graph. The relation between a fragment and the response is visible, not implicit.
01Exact target
02Typed relation
03Recursive review
04Personal view
01 · CONTEXT

Comment the fragment, not the page.

A review can point to the whole document, a paragraph, an image region, or another review.

The target is explicitly marked and remains visually connected to the response. This preserves the local context that is normally lost when discussion is separated from the material being discussed.

source object→selected fragment→typed comment→visible relation
COMmix document with contextual comments attached to exact fragments
Contextual anchoring: comments remain connected to the exact place they refer to.
02 · RECURSION

Comments become objects.

A response does not end the relation chain. It can be reviewed, questioned, accepted, rejected or explained again.

This naturally produces a graph of relationships rather than a flat comment feed. The original document is simply level zero; every review adds another level to the same interaction structure.

Recursive COMmix review graph with multiple relation types
A recursive network of reviews and responses.
COMmix tree representation of recursive comments
The same relationships can be inspected as a tree when hierarchy is more useful than spatial layout.
03 · RELATION TYPES

The link carries meaning.

The unit of interaction is not just a message. It is a relation: who says what, about which target, and in what role.

Question, agreement, disagreement, reminder, source, attention and other review types can be represented explicitly. The graph therefore keeps not only content, but also the structure of the discussion.

TargetThe exact fragment or object the response refers to.
RelationThe semantic type of the response: question, agreement, objection, source, reminder and more.
HistoryThe relation remains visible as the discussion grows, so later readers can reconstruct why each branch exists.
COMmix application overview showing documents and the web interface
COMmix as a working web application rather than a static visualization concept.
04 · PERSONAL MODERATION

Filter your view without deleting the shared history.

Different users can choose what they want to see without requiring one global moderator to rewrite the common discussion.

A user can hide a particular review, a branch, or an author's material for their own view. The original content remains in the system; the moderation decision belongs to the reader's personal representation.

COMmix personal blocking interface
Historical interface for personal blocking / visibility control.
The core idea is not “comments beside content.” It is a persistent, manipulable graph of relations between content and reactions to it.